A structured hypothesis built from a described interaction.
TypeInteractions analyzes how an account presents information, decisions, actions and the relationship. The result suggests a SOCA profile and interpretive cues with their level of uncertainty.
Why start with free text?
Because a real interaction contains context, hesitation, priorities and connections between ideas that checkboxes do not capture in the same way.
Less directed expression
You choose the situation, details and narrative order. There is no expected answer to select.
Signals considered together
The model does not classify a text from a few keywords. It combines several patterns across the full account.
Visible uncertainty
The result displays reliability indicators. If the signals remain ambiguous, the app should show it.
From account to result in five steps.
The analysis flow prioritizes text quality, hypothesis consistency and a clear presentation.
Account
You describe an interaction in 2,000 to 5,000 characters without personal identifiers.
Context
The analysis places each phrase within the overall logic of the text.
Hypotheses
Several signals contribute to a SOCA profile hypothesis.
Evaluation
Reliability and the relational axis indicate how clear or ambiguous the result is.
Reading
The Essential Profile organizes cues into readable sections.
What the Essential Analysis includes.
The current product offers one analysis level: the Essential Analysis.
- An estimated SOCA profile identity
- A profile reliability indicator
- A relational-axis indicator
- An MBTI correspondence provided as an indication
- Up to seven sections that put the result into context
- Access to upcoming Complete Profiles, with no imposed choice
Two indicators to consider before the four letters.
The suggested profile only makes sense alongside the quality of the signals supporting it.
A reference, never a requirement.
SOCA is the framework used by TypeInteractions. The 16 Complete Profiles correspond to the 16 combinations offered in the app. When the library becomes available, you will be free to choose any profile even if an Essential Analysis suggests another one.
Important limitations.
The methodological boundaries should remain clear in both the app and the website.
The text influences the result
The topic, length, context and richness of the account can change the hypothesis. Another text may help confirm it.
This is not a diagnosis
The analysis is neither medical nor clinical. It does not assess mental health and does not replace a professional.
This is not proof about another person
The result reflects the dynamic reconstructed from your account. It does not provide certain access to another person’s inner experience.
Questions about the method.
Does TypeInteractions analyze handwriting?
No. The app works with the linguistic and discursive content of typed or pasted text, not graphology.
Why are at least 2,000 characters required?
A developed text provides more context and signals to connect. The current maximum is 5,000 characters.
Is the analysis read by a person?
During normal service operation, no. Processing is automated by a language model.
Are MBTI and SOCA identical?
No. MBTI is presented as an indicative correspondence. The SOCA profile is the result’s primary framework.